Видео

Where do you usually find them for those prices?

Do the gears retract

Where can i buy it?

Legend has it that he will come back some say. i hope that day is soon

Honestly, if I get one these, I will not care about a slight inaccuracy, because I'll be having too much fun moving the turrets around while listening to Dreadnought

There is all but no comparison between the Yamatos and the Iowas in a surface action. In every area of consideration except that of maximum speed (armor protection, gunnery accuracy, broadside weight, bursting charge, danger space), the Yamato were clear superiors. This is due primarily to the fact that the Japanese spared no expense in constructing the most powerful battleship ever built. On the other hand, the Iowas were simply treaty battleships with the provisions of the escalator clause worked into the design. The result of the additional 10,000 tons was a capital ship with slightly better armor protection and slightly better firepower over the South Dakotas, but with a 5.5- knot speed advantage. The intent of the navy was to use these ships to escort carriers and to overtake and destroy the Japanese Kongo class fast battleships. Shell dispersion of the Iowa class was half again as large as that of the Yamatos (1.9% of range vs. 1.3% of range for nine- gun salvos)- and this more than offset the marginal range accuracy of the U.S. Navy Mark 8 Radar Range Keeper over the foretop rangefinder and Type 22 radar of the Yamato class (approximately 50 and 70 yards respectively). The sole clear advantage of the Iowas lay in remote power control. This was the ability of the Mark 8 to directly maintain the ship's main battery on target in both range and bearing in all visibility conditions- but the U.S. Navy never developed tactics to take advantage of this during WW2. Combat performance revealed a marked difference in the performance of the two classes. None of the Iowa's ever obtained main battery hits on any warship of destroyer size or larger during WW2. Off Samar, Yamato obtained three first- salvo 18.1" hits on USS Johnston at over 20,000 yards. She also registered one first- salvo hit from a six- gun salvo of her forward turrets, aimed solely by the ship's Type 22 radar (the Yamatos used radar- assisted gunnery at this point in the war) on USS Gambier Bay from just under 22,000 yards. She also dropped two shells 'right alongside' USS White Plains from just over 34,000 yards. One of them exploded, and the damage removed White Plains from front- line service for the remainder of the war. Below are the immunity zones of the two vessels against one another's main battery (in yards, and with a 90- degree target angle). Information is courtesy of the U.S. Navy Bureau of Ordnance. Long range in the U.S. Navy was considered to be in the area of 22,000- 25,000 yards. Iowa class immunity vs. the 18.1" gun ; Citadel 24,800- 29,800 Turrets 24,700- 31,600 Barbettes 26,500- 31,600 Steering 24,700- 28,800 Control Tower 26,500- 31,600 Yamato class immunity vs. the 16" .50 cal. gun; Citadel 17,000- 34,500 Turrets 0- 36,800 (Impenetrable) Barbettes 16,600- 36,800 Steering 19,100- 33,400 Control Tower 16,600- 33,400 The Bismarcks were designed (and armored) for operations in the North Sea and North Atlantic where visibility was typically lower. Consequently, they were very vulnerable to long- range plunging fire. In 1941, this was a relatively minor issue. By 1944, this was largely reversed.

😊youtube.com/@mohzari

I'm getting a little tired of you people and your worship of size. The Missouri had better targeting was five knots faster and was at least as well protected. They could literally run rings around the Yamato.

Things that would win or lose a battleship encounter. Tactics, Intel, Range of the weapons, Ability of the shells to penetrate the other ships armor, and most importantly Gunnery (the ability to land the rounds where they can do damage). The last, weakest factor is "Luck" (having the weather in your favor, the "lucky shot" like the one landed on HMS Hood). That's my 2 cents on it. Great video.

Where did you buy these models bc i wanna buy em

Navis Neptun Spidernavy at 1:1250 scale are simply stunning if you can find them at reasonable prices. Force of Valor are nice, but still look too much like toys. No rigging and the masts look like an afterthought and are molded rather poorly in several instances. The USS Enterprise is fairly impressive, however.

There is another parameter. The spotter planes. Which had the best range Yamato’s or Missouri’s??? Also don’t forget that Tirpitz had great secondary battery and torpedoes, so if she could make it close she had a great chance.

Nope. You are so totally wrong. The Missouri would win.

My dad was stationed at Holloman from '84 - '88. Fun place. Kinda in the middle nowhere.

I love Battleships. Battleships are the strongest.

Lol 😆 🤣 I laughed because the Yamato took the win... until we get a few destroyers and destroyer escorts entering the chat lol 😆

My uncle bought me this back in 2014 and it brought me so much joy

Crazy ? Not at all . As a kid I always compared my models to determine which was more powerful.

Where did you get the model ships from? They look super cool

How the hell do you buy these I can’t find any

It also bombed the French Fleet. She was a Battlecruiser with 15 inch guns. Upgraded and as good on paper as Bismarc. In terms of armor and guns. Hood sailed the seas for over 20 yrs and Bismarc sank with wet paint. Hood was longer than Bismarc.

Nfnamskjr

The Missouri 16" 50 were better than Yamato, they could shoot farther, faster and accurately because the range finders were better. Missouri could engage earlier than Yamato and was faster, they could stay out of range of Yamato and defeat it.

Beautiful collection. This video is 7 years old. I stumbled onto a bunch of Tail Winds at my local H-E-B grocery store here in Texas about 3 months ago. I bought all 7 options available. Awesome planes for the price👍

She was sunk in 1945 musashi sunk in the battle of leyte gulf of sibuyan sea in 1944

Great models. Nice collection. You said the F/A-18 can do whatever you wanted it to do so, can it really Growl ?? 😁

Pronounced…Yah-Ma-Toe (Yamato)

cough cough the forces of valor is the least accuret Tirpitz model i have ever seen

you got a lot of history on my most fav battleship it's sad

I just re assembled mine and everything still works including the original string.

Fact the Yamato class according to engineering reports was in worst condition than the Bismarck class, with cases of light bulps blowing up for no reason to internal wiring

I remember getting this in Toys 'R' Us for $16.95 and I really did like how realistic they looked. Fast Forward years later and here I am ordering it online from eBay for $30. These model planes were amazing and just glorious to look at

Just ordered this one! I’ve also got Missouri and Tirpitz from the Forces of Valor series, so I’m optimistic!

The navy put 19 torpedoes in the Yamato. That is not counting the bombs they dropped on her. Yamato was very tuff. It also matters where the 16" shell hits the Yamato/what angle. The Yamato could do more damage at greater distance I believe. Yamato was very thick at the water line and below.

0:00 the legend was born

Took a lot of work but managed to buy all individual models produced including WWI and the jets. Have a large display and love them. Best diecast planes I have come across. Can't recommend them enough!

Can anybody hint out what brand made the same scale back in the 90s?

The shit that hit the Hood was a one in a million shot roots hat hit right at the low point of the wake allowing a shell to penetrate. The Tirpitz vs Missouri would have been a closer match. It all comes down to FIRE CONTROL One example of the handicap of the Yamato's WWI era optical fire control was that the Yamato got it's ass kicked and had to tuck tail and run by 3 destroyers, 1 DE and a handful of jeep carriers at Samar. The Mo could stand off and outrange the Yamato all day Long with high probability of multiple hits before the Yamato got into the effective range of it's guns.

Ark Royal had an armoured deck not wooden like most American carriers. That's why the deck was thinner.

I know this video is pretty old, but I was just wondering if the Mk. 7 16 in turrets rotate on these models. You showed them elevate but not whether they rotated or not.

Does they float in water?

Is thoes models Revell?

Do they still make these

Could you tell me which collection the f 22 belongs to? I want to get it

Dope collection. Just bought a bunch OP n Ebay to collect.

Bismark( Battleship) .. Brand new. H ms Hood (Battlecruiser) ..Ww1 though upgraded was Old. Lucky shot and that's history. Had that lucky shot not happened a decent battle would have taken place. Hms Prince of Wales was dogged with probs as she was a brand new ship also. Turrets kept jamming and or did not work but still she damaged Bismark enough for it to try and head to port for repairs. After sinking Hood, Hms pow could not engage both as it was not match fit to take on both Prince Eugene and Bismark, so broke off.

Had the hood been hauled In for modernization and her deck armour reinforced to match warships of the WW2 era who knows it may have been a different outcome with Bismarck. All speculation in hindsight.

in any confrontation it the skills of the commander and it crew?

I like all of these Maisto Fighter Jets are F-14 Tomcat, F-15 Eagle, and F-18 Hornet👍🛩🛩🛩👨‍✈️😎👫👭🇺🇸

Cool! Where can you buy these models?